http://ps3.ign.com/articles/756/756202p1.html


Preface：

引用:

There are two kinds of people in the world - Beatles fans and Elvis fans. Wait. Actually, there are two kinds of gamers in the world - graphics fans and gameplay fans.

Morgan Jaffit:

引用:

If we were to do a Wii title, we would want to take absolute advantage of the Wii's abilities. Likewise, if we were to do an Xbox 360 title then we would want to make it as strong graphically as a 360 title can be. But we'd also want to make it something that could easily be ported to the PS3, and vice versa. In our perspective those are very similarly linked SKUs. Particularly when you're looking at a game with a 15 million dollar budget, we would want to be able to make it work on both.

If you look at the on-paper specs, the PS3 doesn't have this mythical, untapped reservoir of power. There's been a lot of talk about that, but it doesn't seem to be there. I have yet to see the evidence of this. It's always hard, a generation out - I'm not suggesting it won't happen, though.

I think it's interesting, in this age of high definition, that a TV's standard definition is 640 x 480 - and it looks real. So what are we doing wrong? The answer is very complex and goes into a bunch of things; but there's no theoretical reason why we shouldn't be making realistic games in 640 x 480.

引用:

Simple things work well. Strong art direction is absolutely key. Gears does look fantastic, but it also has really strong art direction - if it didn't have that strong art direction, it wouldn't be garnering the attention that it has. Look at a title like Resistance: Fall of Man on PS3 - it doesn't have particularly strong art direction, and hasn't really made the same impact. From a technical perspective, it's very comparable to Gears of War. So why isn't it garnering the same attention? It comes down to the art direction. It looks like everything else.

引用:

From a design perspective, I like a smooth framerate. The link between player and the game is the most important thing. So disrupting that by chopping the framerate is something that I try to avoid. There isn't an answer that's right for every game. It's really important to select the priority for the game. For a game like Shadow of the Colossus, it had amazing, amazing art direction, but sometimes the framerate would stutter. That was their call. It wasn't doing particularly incredible things with the hardware, but the art direction was there.

火星了

PS区都有中文版了

http://www.tgfcer.com/club/thread-5835699-1-1.html

“简洁的风格总是好处理，强劲的美工导向是关键，设备本身并没什么特别，但有着很强的美工导向，假如不如此，就没办法赢得玩家的注意，例如PS3的【抵抗】，就没有较强的美工导向，没有实现相应的视觉冲击，技术上来讲，并不比战争机器差，但2者效果就有很大区别，还是画风的问题”

——重点？

是640X480的真正的电视上的比赛画面强，

还是1080P的PS3实况足球强？

引用:

原帖由 cloudian 于 2007-1-20 09:35 发表
“简洁的风格总是好处理，强劲的美工导向是关键，设备本身并没什么特别，但有着很强的美工导向，假如不如此，就没办法赢得玩家的注意，例如PS3的【抵抗】，就没有较强的美工导向，没有实现相应的视觉冲击，技术 ...

原文只是说技术上有可比性，翻译出来怎么就成了技术不比GOW差了？

好文，留着慢慢看

640X480的真正的电视上的比赛画面强
-------------------------------------------------------
顶,再多少P也是渣
世界杯期间的高清信号是多少的?只看过截图

期待4D