估计60帧会降低码率吧，不过不期待手机上的表现，至少我测试下来手机的WIFI全他妈低能延时感人（就算5G也如此）PSV明显好很多
u0_a232@SGP621:/ $ ping 192.168.16.1
PING 192.168.16.1 (192.168.16.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.16.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=43.0 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.16.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=12.1 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.16.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=20.1 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.16.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=8.28 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.16.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=129 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.16.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=31.7 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.16.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=7.96 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.16.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=16.4 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.16.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=5.47 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.16.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=109 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.16.1: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=19.4 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.16.1: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=10.7 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.16.1: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=20.8 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.16.1: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=2.51 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.16.1: icmp_seq=15 ttl=64 time=123 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.16.1: icmp_seq=16 ttl=64 time=30.0 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.16.1: icmp_seq=17 ttl=64 time=26.7 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.16.1: icmp_seq=18 ttl=64 time=21.8 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.16.1: icmp_seq=19 ttl=64 time=3.49 ms
这是索尼自家设备在5G下ping路由器网关的德行，还试了三星家一众产品一个鸟样。尝试关闭无线网卡的节能模式依然垃圾，而PSV基本稳定在1ms。手机无线网卡的自动节能模式太垃圾（非待机模式而是开屏正常工作模式）

引用:

原帖由 心御剑 于 2015-3-13 09:17 发表


PSV用什么测的PING？

用电脑或者路由器ping你的PSV地址就行了